#WASABI VS BACKBLAZE B2 ARCHIVE#
#WASABI VS BACKBLAZE B2 DOWNLOAD#

If using the cloud for backup and archive is currently the only priority, consider these providers. These providers have some of the lowest cost of hot storage and egress costs. On the other hand, with multi-service cloud providers, data can be repurposed directly in the cloud.

#WASABI VS BACKBLAZE B2 DOWNLOAD#

Requires a download from cloud for any re-purposing of data.Limited to storage only offerings making it a challenge to expand to cloud editorial, transcoding etc.Simpler and more transparent pricing makes these options more predictable.Fewer storage options make it easier to get up and running than multi-service cloud providers.However, Wasabi limits the amount of data downloaded to the amount of data stored. Wasabi is unique in that it offers download at no egress costs.Both Wasabi and Backblaze offer “hot” access storage at a cost approaching cold storage offerings from AWS and Azure. They offer simpler pricing models for their storage offerings but lack the ability to provide a broader set of workflows e.g. These include Wasabi and Backblaze cloud providers that specialize in providing cloud-based object storage. Wasabi or Backblaze for Business – Cost Comparison Note that this access cost is different from the egress costs. This column what the costs would be (Storage Only) if no access was performed. ** Storage + Access v/s Storage Only: Larger cloud providers tend to charge an “access cost” for colder storage tiers. NOTE: Click on each provider for a detailed breakdown of costs. In the following table, we compare storing 100 TB of content in each cloud provider with a 10% retrieval every month. ĭNAfabric supports Amazon AWS S3, Microsoft Azure Blob, Google Cloud as a target for project backup and archive (Avid Media Composer, Adobe Premiere, AAF) and workspace backup and archive. Consider re-purposing in the cloud as the egress charges are minimal for retrieving within the same AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud datacenter. However, egress costs can be curbed if content is re-purposed in the cloud.Įgress costs for AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud can often be a majority of the price you pay for cloud storage. Egress costs can be high with these providers.

Pricing is often confusing and can result in unforeseen and exorbitant costs.

Can be complex and cumbersome to set up.

DNAfabric) supports tiering to colder storage options. However, ensure your backup and archive provider (e.g.

They offer a multitude of video storage options and provide the absolute lowest cost of storage e.g.

Editing in cloud, transcoding in cloud), these providers are the way to go.

If you are looking to build a cloud strategy beyond backup and archive for a video pipeline (e.g.

Each of these providers can serve as a target for video backup and archive workflows. Hyperscaler (AWS, Azure and Google Cloud) cloud providers enable a multitude of services including compute, networking, file-systems, object storage and applications. Amazon AWS S3 vs Microsoft Azure Blob vs Google Cloud for Business – Cost Comparison

Wasabi vs backblaze b2